Yikes! How nearly a decade took the fun out of Monza (Video Comparison)

Photo: Yikes! How nearly a decade took the fun out of Monza (Video Comparison)
If you haven't checked out our facebook page, you must! Click like and join in the fun. We also tweet a lot. Follow us!

Are Formula 1 cars as fun as they use to be?

Over a year ago, I shared an incredible side by side video which demonstrated the immense speed and grip that Formula 1 cars have over other racing machines.

The videos were shot from the same angle, at the foot of Eau Rouge. It was a real compliment to modern F1 beasts as they took the challenge of one of the greatest corners on the planet.

Now let’s take a look at another video comparison. This time its F1 v F1, Ferrari v Ferrari around an entire lap of Monza, one of the greatest circuits in the world – or at least certainly one of the fastest. The difference here is they are from 9 years apart, so not quite a decade but close enough.

A side by side comparison video of F1 Monza

Click here to launch the video comparison now.
Or continue reading the rest of the article first.

I am 25 years old so essentially spent my childhood watching F1 in the mid 1990’s, but got a proper grip on the sport during the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. This of course is the era of the beloved V10 engine.

My first real experience of a V10 engine at full chat was the 2001 British Grand Prix around Copse corner, not a bad place to start eh? When V8’s came in, I was devastated, but still chuffed I’d at least got a few years of memories from around Silverstone of that awesome sound and feeling. In my opinion, they were so much better, and obviously extremely more powerful than what we have now.

It’s only from digging around on youtube.com and checking out some old onboard videos around Monza it started to dawn on me how toned down the modern F1 car is in comparison to those “glory days.”

Watching how fast a V10 powered F1 car can get round the Autodromo Nazionale di Monza and how much it can attack the kerbs in phenomenal! They also had the benefit of higher aerodynamic packages meaning the cornering speeds are far greater also. But no slick tyres!

The side by side below is slightly unfair in that Schumacher’s 2003 video is his pole lap, where as Alonso’s 2011 lap is during the race, fat with fuel. But back when refueling was allowed, there was nothing to stop the drivers running on light-ish fuel loads and enjoying the types of speed you’ll see below. It blew me away how much more fun and on the absolute ragged edge it looked back then…

A side by side comparison video of F1 Monza

Click here to launch the video comparison above.

What do you think? Has F1 engine technology been toned down too much? Do you miss the V10 days? Will the new 2014 regulations make comparisons like this even more dramatic? Let me know in the comments.

Posted by . - Follow him on twitter @enterf1.

Comment with facebook

Other comments

#1 CLB | 12 Sep 2012, 18:03 Reply »

You seem to be implying that the V10s had more straight line speed and that the old aero package also produced higher speed cornering.

You do realize that the 2012 pole lap was 1:19.41, while Schumacher's 2003 pole lap was 1:20.963?

Kind of pokes a hole in your theory doesn't it?

#2 Jimmy@enterF1 | 12 Sep 2012, 18:24 Reply »

Hamilton completed the race in 1hr 19mins and 41 seconds. His pole position lap was 1:24.010

#3 Jimmy@enterF1 | 12 Sep 2012, 18:26 Reply »

Schumacher's 2003 race winning time was: 1:14.19.838

Hamilton crossed the line over 5 minutes later in 2012

#4 LordRegardngton | 12 Sep 2012, 23:00 Reply »

V10s did produce more straight line speed and old aero did produce higher cornering speeds. That's not even in dispute. Hamilton's pole of 1.24 and Rosberg's fastest lap of 1.27 is pathetic. It's not fast at all. The cars are safe and slow, and in two or three years they will be completely safe and uselessly slow. Then everyone will watch to see who can drive slowly the fastest.

#5 Mike Smith | 13 Sep 2012, 02:01 Reply »

If the performance of the 1.5 turbo engines of the '80s is anything to go by then the coming 1.6 turbos should be spectacular. Almost another 25 years of technology will be built into the new platform. How can that be useless?

#6 AUB | 13 Sep 2012, 02:09 Reply »

Yeah a few years ago it toom only a mere couple of hours to fly to NY, now there is no concorde any longer, is iit just me or these all seem to misprovents.

#7 BH | 13 Sep 2012, 09:23 Reply »

Hahaha, CLB, make sure you click on Qualifying Results rather than Race Results before you start having a go!!

Did you not even watch the video??

Kind of looking forward to hearing and seeing the turbo's, i will make a judgement then!!

#8 Jimmy@enterF1 | 13 Sep 2012, 09:53 Reply »

When I read the original comment, I just thought "No.... NO!!!" - the lap is clearly faster in the comparison! Hence I though it was worth a share!

With regards to the turbos, totally agree with you and Mike Smith - I'll reserve judgement until we get to see them in action. This was more about sharing my love for the old V10!

#9 irlirie | 13 Sep 2012, 20:49 Reply »

The cars these days even sound slower than those in the early 2000's. I wish they could at least bring refueling back into the picture. Seeing initial "fastest laps" around the 1:31 mark in the Italian GP is almost depressing... that is nearly a full 20 seconds than the lap Schumacher posts on the video. Also, once the fuel burns off, typically, there is no need for the frontrunners to put up fast laps, although there have been some exceptions this year. Crank it up, is all that I am saying. I love F1, but if the trend continues, this series may be along the level of Indy Car Series very soon. What a depressing thought.

Please post a new comment:

Your name*

Your email*

Comment*

Are you human? * We hate spam! Please enter the following number into the box below: 34

* Please complete all 4 fields to send a comment.

From James Wilson, the owner of enterF1.com:
EnterF1 Flag

"Thanks for visiting our website, enterF1.com. Have you got a suggestion? A potential improvement? Or if you would just like to get in touch with us then please do!"

"We listen to all our website fans and love to hear from you, so please leave some feedback or feel free to tweet me @enterF1 or check out my personal page here: ."