Brundle and Coulthard review and comparison
Murray Walker - "What's that? There's a BODY on the track!!!"
Review
It has to be said from one race that the Martin Brundle, David Coulthard partnership seems pretty solid. It was not without it problems at times Brundle just did not seem to keep up. The usually hawked eyes Brundle at first thought Vitaly Petrov was in third on the first lap when he was in fact in fourth and he also did not notice Michael Schumacher pitting. The nerves of David Coulthard were also apparent with lines such as "well what's going to be interesting though is er as we rejoin we've got Sebastian Vettel there, massive lead in that first lap!" He never did return to his first point and we never did find out what was going to be interesting. These are little points that will be ironed out in the Grands Prix to come. I personally felt that it was a good start and many of you agreed. Over 50% of you felt that Martin Brundle was "Really good" whilst in the same survey Martin Brundle was voted the favourite of James Allen, Murray Walker and Jonathan Legard with Murray drawing a close second. I think we have good times to come and a pairing that will last longer than a couple of seasons.
Comparison - Legard
Now a lot of the F1 fans did not like Legard and it is clear to see why when you take a look at some of his stunning lines such as "There is Glock in the red and white Toyota followed by Trulli in another red and white Toyota." Also those many times he made you rush back to the room from making a drink when he shouts "AND THAT'S HAMILTON..." followed by "...into the pits." Such unnecessary shouting caused the public to dislike him. But above all one of the reasons many disliked Legard was because of his blatant interrupting of the publics favourite, Brundle. in just 6 minutes of transcription I found 7 interruptions, that's more than one a minute! I only found one case of interrupting in the Brundle-Coulthard transcript of the same amount of time. When looking at the transcript of Legard I actually noticed how much Brundle actually spoke; almost more than Legard! Maybe this is because Brundle had to spend so much time explaining what was happening to him. Having said that Coulthard did not speak nearly enough during his first race although I will put that down to nerves. However, it was not all bad with Legard, he was very good at the loud, exciting bits (when he timed them correctly) and at first glance I would not say Brundle carries it off as well although at least he can time when to shout.
Comparison - Allen
One of the anomalies that appeared on the survey was that whilst most of you put Murray walker or Martin Brundle as your favourite it was James Allen who came out on top of the anonymous transcript section. This surprised me because I was never a fan of James Allen but apparently lines like "Turn up you volume, sound and enjoy as we... go... raciiiiiing" entertain the majority of F1 watchers. Allen was a decent commentator who knew when to shout but just made too many stupid comments. Although these stupid comments are sometimes what make a commentator; it never did legend Murray Walker any harm. I wonder whether the new partnership will be too clinical, too perfect? Whilst Brundle graces us with the odd funny such as "that will shake his fillings out,"
Comparison - Walker
Whilst we were on the subject of funny lines here is one for you:-
Murray Walker: "What's that? There's a BODY on the track!!!"
Co-commentator: "Um, I think that that is a piece of BODY-WORK, from someone's car."
I just cannot see moments like that with Martin Brundle and David Coulthard. Whilst I like both of them for their knowledge they never will be the partnership that Was Murray Walker and (ironically) Martin Brundle. That was my favourite pairing, the crazy passion from Murray Walker balanced by the calm, excellent insight from Martin Brundle.
In the end
Obviously it is early days and I see this partnership going down very well. They offer insight that means you do not have to be part of the F1 'hardcore' to enjoy it but at the same time keeping the 'hardcore" happy. In the words of Martin Brundle himself in his interview with F1 racing magazine (brilliant by the way) "that's why I'll talk about drag squares per speed, then in the next breath will be talking about how tyre graining is like using an eraser on a pencil line" This is what is brilliant and will go down well. It is also noticeable that he and David Coulthard have a mutual respect which is apparent meaning neither steps on the others toes. Whilst this partnership is not quite Walker-Brundle it will still go down well in mine and other F1 fan' books.
What did you think of Martin Brundle and David Coulthard's debut?
Posted by Sean Russell - Follow him on twitter @SeanRussellF1.
Like us on Facebook! »
More F1 Posts »
- 2012 Spanish GP: Hamilton and that 31 lap stint!
- Williams F1 Fire: Photos and video from dramatic post race inferno
- Lewis Hamilton blasts the rest away with pole in Spain
- An absolutely mega F1 prize you can win with the Lotus F1 Team
- Remembering Roland Ratzenberger and Ayrton Senna
- 2012 Bahrain GP: Vettel returns to the top, and Rosberg escapes penalties
- Sebastian Vettel takes his first pole since 2011
- 2012 Chinese Grand Prix: Thrilling late overtaking and tyres falling off the cliff
- Nico Rosberg takes his first pole position ahead of Lewis Hamilton
- 2012 Malaysia GP: Sergio Perez 2nd in Malaysia – but does the race need to start earlier?
Last Comment Posted »
Yeah I also agree! That is the reason I like the MotoGP pairing because those two are literally just like watching with some mates!
by Sean@enterF1
[ click here to read in full ]
- Share this page:
DiggIt
Del.icio.us
Stumble Upon
![]() |
"Thanks for visiting our website, enterF1.com. Have you got a suggestion? A potential improvement? Or if you would just like to get in touch with us then please do!" "We listen to all our website fans and love to hear from you, so please leave some feedback or feel free to tweet me @enterF1." |






Recent comments on this article:
#1 Jimmy@enterF1 | 29 Mar 2011, 21:49 Reply »
Great article Sean! I share your views on the weekend's effort by DC and MB.
Brundle does make me laugh with his analogies. Even on the warm up lap I burst out laughing when he said:
"this always looks a bit of a laugh this lap round to the grid" - which is a nice, light hearted way to introduce a piece of information regarding why the warm up lap is so important.
The absolute gold though came on the F1 forum when Eddie Jordan got all irate about teams putting covers up infront of their garages after the race and stopping the fans seeing the cars. He then pointed at the Red Bull garage and said something along the lines of "Look the world champions don't do it!!!!!!!"
DC then pointed out to EJ that their weren't any cars actually in the garage to hide, but there was a fold up chair!! Was very funny, Eddie knew he'd dropped the ball big time on that one!
#2 MT | 29 Mar 2011, 23:34 Reply »
I'd prefer Legard back if I'm honest, Coulthard is ok for analysis but he's too dry for the action of a race. Time will tell.
#3 snow888 | 30 Mar 2011, 04:20 Reply »
A good article showing a good comparison. Although I just want to say that, commentators are human as well and they make mistakes. It can be sometimes easy to criticize commentators over every single blunder. Commentating, I believe should be secondary to racing - after all, racing is KING.
But yes, poor commentating can leave one feeling unsatisfied and unknowingly irritated. Remember though, some races are inherently boring, and this makes the commentators' jobs harder.
One needs to put themselves in the shoes of a Legard, and ask themselves, what they would say in a particular time of the race (when there is nothing going on). Commentating isn't as easy as it sounds.
Peace out.
#4 Jimmy@enterF1 | 30 Mar 2011, 09:00 Reply »
Hey snow888 - I think a lot of his criticism came from his commentary during the non-boring moments actually. For instance, I noticed that on the starts all he did is just list out the cars closest to him on the screen "Vettel..... Webber... Button.... Hamilton.... down to the first corner they come!"
On a side note, if you want a commentator telling you EXACTLY how it is, look no further than James Hunt, Monaco 1989: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khA67-r5lSQ lol
#5 Sean@enterF1 | 30 Mar 2011, 14:36 Reply »
Hey, thanks for comenting. Ideally I would have done a full analysis but to be honest would you want to read that? It would be very long.
I do have some trancript for the "boring" parts for each man and I have to say Brundle-Coulthard come out on top in terms of information. I am not criticising most mistakes, to be honest I think that is what makes F1 commentators but some mistakes are not humorous, just plain naive.
#6 Neil Smith | 30 Mar 2011, 18:23 Reply »
I am convinced that there was a race last season where Brundle told Legard not to interrupt him, just slightly off mike, but not fully, after he had been cut off once again whilst making a point.
My problem with Legard was that in addition to constantly interrupting the ever interesting Brundle, I found the tone/pitch of his voice quite irritating! For me it was like having someone asking you questions while you are concentrating, very distracting. With the new team the sound is warm and even, and their volume and tone rises with the exciting bits. It's more like watching your favourite sport with knowledgeable friends, rather than your annoying mate who prefers football.
#7 Jimmy@enterF1 | 30 Mar 2011, 18:51 Reply »
Absolutely spot on!:
"With the new team the sound is warm and even, and their volume and tone rises with the exciting bits. It's more like watching your favourite sport with knowledgeable friends, rather than your annoying mate who prefers football."
#8 Sean@enterF1 | 30 Mar 2011, 18:59 Reply »
Yeah I also agree! That is the reason I like the MotoGP pairing because those two are literally just like watching with some mates!
Please post a new comment: