Are Pirelli taking degradation too far?
Hamilton: "It was almost like doing an out lap"
In the 2010 Canadian Grand Prix one of the most exciting aspects of the racing was the tyre degradation. In Canada, it was seen on an entirely different scale to any other track, it proved to be much tougher on tyres and thus made for another dimension in the race, who was going to pit when? And who will benefit most? Learning from this excitement when Pirelli took over they decided that tyre degradation is integral to the excitement of Formula 1 racing and it was there job to provide this. Under a year later as 2011 winter testing got under way it became apparent that Pirelli achieved what they had set out to do; Provide far softer tyres than their predecessors.
Many teams and drivers have mentioned how quickly these tyres disintegrate. Ferrari's Fernando Alonso believes that in some races we could see as many as four pit stops, an opinion echoed by 2010 World Champion Sebastian Vettel. Lewis Hamilton, perhaps suffering the worst from softer tyres, said "The first run – I didn't think I was pushing very hard – and the tyres were finished after nine laps, down to the canvas. On the next run, I had to go easier. It was almost like doing an out lap and just about made it to 15 or 16 on a soft tyre." Maybe the McLaren is tougher on its tyres but even when not pushing going 15 or 16 laps is a massive step down from the Bridgestone soft which in some races could have lasted the entire race, had the rules not outlawed it.
What does this mean for the actual racing? What does this mean for us spectators? Well it is likely that Formula 1 will become less about who can pull off exciting overtakes, sublime quick laps and will become more about who can look after their tyres the most, or who can pit stop the least. In essence, if these tyres degrade as much as some drivers and teams have mentioned, F1 is going to slow way down.
I do not know about you but I am not keen on watching a race where all that matters is looking after your tyres. I want to see raw speed on the tracks not in the pits. Maybe I could deal with 3 stops but when you start to look at 4 or even more then F1 will become boring again. We had such a brilliant season in 2010 let us hope that these new tyres will not bring F1 down to the speed limit.
Posted by Sean Russell - Follow him on twitter @SeanRussellF1.
Like us on Facebook! »
More F1 Posts »
- 2012 Spanish GP: Hamilton and that 31 lap stint!
- Williams F1 Fire: Photos and video from dramatic post race inferno
- Lewis Hamilton blasts the rest away with pole in Spain
- An absolutely mega F1 prize you can win with the Lotus F1 Team
- Remembering Roland Ratzenberger and Ayrton Senna
- 2012 Bahrain GP: Vettel returns to the top, and Rosberg escapes penalties
- Sebastian Vettel takes his first pole since 2011
- 2012 Chinese Grand Prix: Thrilling late overtaking and tyres falling off the cliff
- Nico Rosberg takes his first pole position ahead of Lewis Hamilton
- 2012 Malaysia GP: Sergio Perez 2nd in Malaysia – but does the race need to start earlier?
Last Comment Posted »
Well just remember the days when Ferrari dominated with MS, the rules changed, the Michelin rubber was better with square angled tyre walls around...
by Jon
[ click here to read in full ]
- Share this page:
DiggIt
Del.icio.us
Stumble Upon
![]() |
"Thanks for visiting our website, enterF1.com. Have you got a suggestion? A potential improvement? Or if you would just like to get in touch with us then please do!" "We listen to all our website fans and love to hear from you, so please leave some feedback or feel free to tweet me @enterF1." |






Recent comments on this article:
#1 MartyP | 12 Mar 2011, 03:47 Reply »
I totally agree with you Sean that 2010 was a very exciting season and that F1 doesn't need to be making too many changes to spice up the show.
I don't think the tyre degradation will be as bad as the teams fear, especially on a Sunday when the circuit is rubbered in. It's a driver's job is to make a car as quick as possible so they will always complain when something isn't perfect. F1 took a big step towards becoming an economy formula when refuelling was banned, so I don't think the new tyres will be a step too far. I guess we won't know till Melbourne! If anything, I would imagine tyre degradation would assist overtaking in much the same way that a wet race does.
#2 Jon | 14 Mar 2011, 15:22 Reply »
Well just remember the days when Ferrari dominated with MS, the rules changed, the Michelin rubber was better with square angled tyre walls around the corners and the Ferrari era ended.
This time we have RedBull, qualifying was effortless for them and many are already fearing a similar dominion.
Uncle Bernie won't like that, he wants us hooked to the TV till the last race like last year, more spectators, more GP tickets sold = more cash for him. A way to make winners random? Make tyres degrade faster! Ross Brawn already mentioned embarrasing pitstop decisions will have to be taken this year ie even 5 stops or more! imagine a 70 lap race with tyres lasting 9 laps during hot weather...
Please post a new comment: